Hacker News Reader

I'm curious to know how Gallop measured their results noting that remote workers are "substantially more engaged in their jobs than traditional counterparts who are stuck behind desks all day." Though I understand the logic, how did they measure this

View on HN

I wonder if there is bias in that companies offering remote working tend to fall into a category of companies that tend to have more highly engaged employees on average. ie, there is much more soul sucking onsite companies mixed with soul enhancing onsite companies and the remote/onsite isn't the critical factor?

They may have observed remoters deliver the same unit of work faster and more correct.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com