If I follow your logic, lethal force is justified in any physical conflict because of the risk of "one wrong bump to the head."
On a personal note, I agree with this. It is unjust to ask people to wait until they're dead to defend themselves, when another person has initiated force that could rapidly become deadly.
It is not uncommon that one pushes another over in anger, and that other is killed. That's not manslaughter, that's murder.
P.S: Be careful mixing up lethal with deadly, or either of those with fatal. There are subtle but important differences.
What, like a cliff? No, I don't think "getting pushed over" is a statistically significant cause of death.