I was fully aware that my criticisms were unlikely to be taken seriously. Otherwise, why would the site have changed from what it was before?

> > … single and multi-thread implementations of some programs…

> There still are — look at "busy" and "cpu load" instead of elapsed "secs".

I do want to clarify this point. I'm aware of the "cpu load" section of the results. That is not at all the same thing. I don't think this was necessarily even intentional before, but the fact that both systems existed, meant that contributors could explicitly optimize for either single-threaded or multi-threaded.

A single-threaded algorithm will likely smoke a locking multi-threaded algorithm when run on a single-core. It will also probably look completely different.