It's a bit unclear what I am getting for $11 (over say a flickr stream).
The main difference between this and a Flickr stream is the focus. Flickr is meant for photography in general, and while you could use it for Project 365, it's less organized and focused. For example, your P 365 entries would be mixed in with your regular flickr uploads.
You need to prove the value of your product before you can start charging users $11. Your frontpage gives no indication of the value added.
Regardless, thanks for the feedback.
> You need to prove the value of your product before you can start charging users $11
Disagree about this. It's obvious what the offering is, so let the user decide if it's worth $11 to them. The expectation of value is set by defining the price point.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/thwarted/sets/72157623777255069...
This is from a 20 line shell script that takes a picture at some random time within a minute after I unlock the screensaver. They are then uploaded manually using kflickr because, honestly, some of them come out really crappy (out of focus/blurry) and I unlock my computer like a 100 times a day.
(To answer the inevitable question, yeah, it's caught me naked a few times.)
Maybe I slightly exaggerated on the size. It's a 14 line shell script and a 57 line perl script. Anyway, it's small. Requires xscreensaver and mplayer and a working USB camera.