My earthquake insurance is more like 0.1% and I'm pretty sure the rates are set by the state - where are you getting your numbers?
If the cost were 0.5% I don't think it would be worth paying, that would buy a lot of seismic reinforcement.
If the cost were 0.5% I don't think it would be worth paying, that would buy a lot of seismic reinforcement.
For CA: "Based on where you live, insuring a single-family house can cost from $2.50 to $5.50 per thousand dollars of coverage" .25% to .55% That's quite significant.
https://www.valuepenguin.com/california-earthquake-insurance...
When buying insurance, you answer questions about your property and the insurance company estimates the cost of replacement of the structure. In my case, it’s about 30% of the market value of the home.
My worry with CEA is in "the big one", will they have enough money? They have $17 billion in assets, which is theoretically enough. However, the Northridge quake caused over $10 billion in damage, and the 1906 earthquake was over $8 billion in todays dollars. (Although I question that number too. 500 city blocks were destroyed in 1906. Would it only take $8 billion to rebuild 500 SF city blocks?)
If we see a major San Andreas quake that devastates LA, the CEA could run out of money.
I imagine everyone in the building trades will be fully employed in the rebuilding effort even if CEA runs out of money. The state would probably bail the CEA out, but either way people are going to be waiting for a long time for someone to come give them a new house.