I hope it crashes and burns. It's the opposite of what crypto was meant to achieve. No central control.
How can I, me, one person, make something that is 'better' (how do you even define that) and will get more adoption than something that is being rolled out by one of the largest and already most popular platforms?
What a ridiculous statement you've made. Just a useless statement to make yourself feel superior, is what it looks like.
Facebook's ads business didn't even get off the ground until they had already begun to hire massively. Zuck's prototype and marketing might have brought in the users, but FB would be nowhere without its billions in ad revenue.
It may not be impossible, but in this case it should be sane to assume it would be a waste of energy for a single person to attempt it.
Remove the history behind Facebook and just look at the numbers of the LibraCoin consortium and you’re not dealing with just one person. That’s the lens someone wanting to make a competitor should be looking through, not that LibraCoin has a long thread tying back to “just” Zuck. That catalyst has little to do with the challenge of competing with LibraCoin as it has started today.
Any changes start from one person trying to do so. I'm arguing that’s the lens you should have in mind.