This is why Apple sells the LG 5K display and why their iMacs have 5K displays when possible. Third party displays do work, but when you want to get into crazy town resolutions it's much harder to find them with high quality.
This is why Apple sells the LG 5K display and why their iMacs have 5K displays when possible. Third party displays do work, but when you want to get into crazy town resolutions it's much harder to find them with high quality.
I have to ask - what's the value of 5k over 4k? 4k is already 'retina' quality (speaking of my 32" 4k as reference), what does another 1024 horizontal lines bring to the party?
My 13" MacBook Pro is 13.3" at 2560x1600 or 227 PPI.
My 24" 4K monitor is 24" at 3840x2160 or 184 PPI.
Your 32" 4K monitor is 138 PPI, so only 60% of the density of MacBook displays.
Random super low quality image of this. http://noamkroll.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Screen-Shot-...
I'd like a 16:10 or even 4:3 monitor at 200+dpi, but they don't exist. (Maybe that IBM beast from ~2000.)