It's not an assumption, it's explicitly part of the model.
Same with "What's south of the south pole." It ignores the stars and galaxies past Earth itself.
If I say "the latex in this balloon is like the surface of the earth," I'm not so much ignoring the stars & galaxies, they're just not part of the analogy.
Is your point that, for an object to be curved, there must be something for it to curve into? For example, in order for a 2D surface (like the latex in the balloon) to be curved, it necessarily must be in a 3D (or higher) space?