Hacker News Reader

Comment by Circuits | Hacker News Reader

You don't think not mentioning any of the other problems with nuclear energy hurts the argument? Are we really going to ignore the problem of containing spent fuel?

View on HN

People down voting this comment, care to add a comment about why you are down voting it? Surely, it's not because you believe spent fuel is not a problem? I hope not because it is a HUGE problem perhaps bigger even than dumping CO2 into the air if you ask me.

Dumping CO2 into the air kills ~6 million a year, ~1 million from particulate pollution alone. Burning coal is dumping spent fuel into the air, including uranium and mercury particulates.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-...

Of course it's a bigger problem than storing spent nuclear fuel.

You say that as if you can predict what will happen over the course of the next 10 thousand years. What happens when we run out of places to put the spent fuel? We dig another hole in a another mountain?? What if there is an earth quake 10k years from now and all that spent fuel goes tumbling into the local drinking water? Are you under them impression that stuff like that can't happen or doesn't ever happen? Sounds like a pretty ignorant point of view to me. What if the American government falls and the security details guarding these storage facilities go away and unscrupulous agents have free access to it. They then build thousands of dirty bombs and send the Earth into chaos? You think that's impossible? Sounds to me like you are counting your chickens 10k years before they hatch.

Edit: I read the article, its bias untruthful trash... should I have expect more from Mara Hvistendahl author of such classics as: 'The Vibrator' and 'Origins: The Start of Everything (Where do rainbows come from? What about flying cars, love and LSD?)'

Eventually we'll want to build breeder reactors to burn up almost all the "spent" fuel and leave behind waste that has a much shorter half life than Uranium.

> You say that as if you can predict what will happen over the course of the next 10 thousand years. What happens when we run out of places to put the spent fuel?

You're missing something - coal power ALSO produces radioactive waste. We just seem to be fine with dumping it into the atmosphere.

I am definitely not advocating coal power that's an assumption you made all on your own. The options aren't coal or nuclear, the options are limited, but they are not limited to just two.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com