Still - stuck at 4.88, wondering what I can do better...
Still - stuck at 4.88, wondering what I can do better...
In a certain sense it doesn't matter if the original post is satire - enough people unironically agree for it to be real.
Sure big companies create efficiencies, but they also create Orwellian situations like one above.
Also, IIRC drivers can and do reject rides for people at their predetermined threshold. E.g. they will pass on a 4.0 waiting for a 4.5 or above (or whatever the thresholds may be).
Use a service that doesn't micromanage its customers. Lyft, taxis, city transportation services. Or just (shocker) get your own vehicle. If you're travelling, rental cars are also an option.
Lyft is still doing the same sort of micromanagement (you just have to jump through more hoops to see your rider rating, just like it used to be for Uber), and arguably has even more holes for drivers to abuse the rating system against riders (AFAIK, Lyft drivers can manage to correlate tips against specific rides, and have a 24 post-ride window to go back and change ratings for riders).
>taxis, city transportation services. Or just (shocker) get your own vehicle. If you're travelling, rental cars are also an option.
These aren't necessarily realistic alternatives in all cases.
In many second or third tier metro areas in the US, Lyft and Uber have completely destroyed the local taxi industry, to the point where taxis simply aren't a resource that can be utilized without booking far in advance, and even then their success rate for pickups is questionable.
As for public transport - not a realistic option for general use outside the largest metro areas in the US, and even many of the largest (e.g. Houston, Phoenix, San Antonio, Dallas) have systems that are nearly useless for those traveling outside of very small portions of the metro area, or aren't commuting into central business districts from suburban transit centers.
'Getting your own vehicle' isn't necessarily economically viable in all cases, or even a usable option for those that face challenges related to driving ability.
And rental cars? Aside from making zero sense for certain urban destinations, employers increasingly require business travelers to utilize rideshare services while traveling for work.
Anecdotally, In Midtown Atlanta, in 2008; It took a call and 30 minutes to get a taxi to come pick up < a mile away from major hotels. And on the ride back on a 3 mile trip, magically the taxi's credit card machine was broken.
I've recently been living in Ann Arbor, Michigan. I don't think I can recall even seeing a taxi in the area anywhere other than the taxi stand at the Detroit airport over the past 6 months.
If you are 21 or older. There are a lot of people in the 18-21 range. And, in the 21-4 range there are often fees associated with that age, which can be significant.[1]
[1] https://www.enterprise.com/en/help/faqs/car-rental-under-25....
I'm not particularly fond of traditional taxi services due to a lack of fare transparency and ease of use I expect from "ridesharing" (can we replace this term someday) services, so my rider rating is fairly important to me.
also, by not having a car (and using public transportation/uber/cabs) i like to think i'm helping the my city a tiny bit by not having yet another car on the street when it's not needed.
In my city, taxis have responded to the presence of Uber and Lyft by matching what they do, and taxi companies are thriving.
Aside from the stupid "rating" system and the price of the trip, there is nothing Uber or Lyft offers that isn't matched by real taxi services here.
Are you in the US? I've seen this happening with somewhat questionable success in Europe, but nowhere else.
I know that two of the largest taxi companies in town have just increased the number of drivers they have.
Don’t worry about your 5.0, a 4.9 is honestly more impressive. Ask you next driver to give you a 1* to help you with that.
I can imagine 2 things. 1. Actual rating is way lower and uber is hiding it from us. 2. Their system is buggy.
It's interesting that many people in this thread report 4.88 though. I would assume Uber wants to obfuscate recent ratings (eg if you notice when your rating changed, you might pin point the driver and add a case against them if you 're vengeful enough). Maybe it's similar to the number 300 for youtube (where views stop being counted in realtime and they are being grouped + analyzed). Who knows.
It’s definitely something that worries me as it’s out of my control.