Hacker News Reader

[flagged]

I don't think vaccinepapers.org is a reliable source.

It's a review of this paper [1].

[1] "Assessment of Hair Aluminum, Lead, and Mercury in a Sample of Autistic Egyptian Children: Environmental Risk Factors of Heavy Metals in Autism"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609793/

At least they are biased. You should refer to the CDC - oh wait... doh!

Exactly

Deliberate pseudoscience link. Mods, please remove this.

It's a review of this paper [1]. Why do you consider it pseudoscience?

[1] "Assessment of Hair Aluminum, Lead, and Mercury in a Sample of Autistic Egyptian Children: Environmental Risk Factors of Heavy Metals in Autism"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609793/

As is stated on their homepage[1], vaccinepapers.org takes the position that no currently marketed vaccine is acceptably safe for use because of long-debunked concerns over aluminum adjuvants causing autism.

[1] http://vaccinepapers.org/about/

I asked you about the paper specifically - why do you consider it pseudoscience? And long-debunked? There is really recent research about the dangers of aluminum as an adjuvant. What safety studies of aluminum as an adjuvant are you aware of? I haven't found any really.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com