> If Rust is the answer, why are you pushing for new langs when Rust is sufficient? Something doesn't add up here.
Maybe because he said, twice, that Rust is not all the way there?
Maybe because he said, twice, that Rust is not all the way there?
However if he says "Rust gets us 80% of the way there" as you point out then he is obliged, IMO, to point out explicitly the 20% where it fails or we can't even begin to discuss it.