> If we do, the compiler can just make instances disappear statically when we're done with them -- not dynamically!

Not possible generally. It would be easy to create a situation where some kind of refcount is a necessary final fallback.

> The truth is with most of the Rust I write, I don't have to worry about allocation and deallocation of objects, and it happens.

If Rust is the answer, why are you pushing for new langs when Rust is sufficient? Something doesn't add up here.

> Long live the rocket powered horse!

Your response to someone giving their years of experience is that? Well, we're all convinced now.