If the company decided to do that independently, does that matter? Maybe they could be capitalizing on nationalism?
If the government made them alter it, how would that be different than say Left 4 Dead having different censorship in Germany
"In its place, Game for Peace is very much the type of game that will pass the demands of China’s game censorship body."
The idea being that consumers aren't the primary drivers for changes in what is available in the market. Rather this decision was primarily influenced by a central government body that controls what is available in the market. It's an explicit example of levers being pulled by the government in a planned economy, in contrast to a more "democratic" if you will, market mechanism.
L4D was also censored in Australia I think.
So I could see "an entire world where the Nazis won WW2, and the resulting propaganda everywhere" getting a hard look.
IIRC in the past blood was also made green but perhaps I'm confusing with other countries.
PUBG is a simple battle royale game with no concept of nations in-game, and the Chinese government banned it until there was pro-Chinese content in game. Wh
"altercation" means "fight".