Tencent replaces PUBG with a Chinese government-friendly alternative
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
> The new Tencent title bears a striking resemblance to PUBG but there are no dead bodies, while it plays up to a nationalist theme with a focus on China’s air force
It looks like the new title was 和平精英. not Game for Peace. Still, it sounds a lot like double-think.
Don't take that name too seriously, I don't think there is anything to it other than to make it sound better.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-Life_(video_game) (Notice the language selection)
It was less popular than Counter-Strike (which was acronymized as CS) in China when I was young. And I didn’t bothered with the translation for years before I realized the correct one.
"反恐精英" on the other hand, should be translated to "Counter-terrorism elite". But "反恐(Counter-terrorism) 精英(elite)" itself is a non-literal translation of Counter-Strike.
I know games seem like a tiny thing, right? But it matters when a government suppresses freedom of expression, even when it comes to a silly video game.
China sees it as their prerogative to do whatever they want to their people, including, by the way, detaining hundreds of thousands without charges in re-education camps.
If you're referring to the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, there is a lot of outcry, but little evidence to back up statements made by Western press. Google doc amalgamating sources: https://tinyurl.com/xinjiangmyths
1. A game developed by Taiwanese studio, Devotion, has been removed from Stream by its developers due to a hiding meme about Xi Jinping founded by Chinese gamers earlier this year.[1]
2. Still earlier this year, Chinese Overwatch players being instantly banned from the game for typing the words "Winnie the Pooh" in public chat.[2]
[1] https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/25/18239937/taiwanese-horror...
[2] https://www.dexerto.com/overwatch/chinese-overwatch-players-...
If the company decided to do that independently, does that matter? Maybe they could be capitalizing on nationalism?
If the government made them alter it, how would that be different than say Left 4 Dead having different censorship in Germany
PUBG is a simple battle royale game with no concept of nations in-game, and the Chinese government banned it until there was pro-Chinese content in game. Wh
"altercation" means "fight".
"In its place, Game for Peace is very much the type of game that will pass the demands of China’s game censorship body."
The idea being that consumers aren't the primary drivers for changes in what is available in the market. Rather this decision was primarily influenced by a central government body that controls what is available in the market. It's an explicit example of levers being pulled by the government in a planned economy, in contrast to a more "democratic" if you will, market mechanism.
L4D was also censored in Australia I think.
So I could see "an entire world where the Nazis won WW2, and the resulting propaganda everywhere" getting a hard look.
IIRC in the past blood was also made green but perhaps I'm confusing with other countries.
Maybe the realpolitik suggests that companies should continue to try in China since the alternative is further isolation between China and the Western world which may hasten hostilities? I just can't fathom why a company like Google still wants to work in China, they'll make product and IP concessions to the Chinese government and will either lose Google China autonomy or be replaced wholesale by a Chinese company. Where is the shareholder value?
Edit: removed inappropriate generalization.
Its actually kind of funny that you accuse me of generalization, since every single chinese I have met in China referred to me as "Englishman" and wanted to take pictures with me because i had "jew hair"
I'm not weighing in on whether you're right or wrong, here, just remarking that you seemed to be demonstrating similar behaviors to those you were complaining about.
It's possible to stereotype or overgeneralize about cultures and people in ways that are not negative.
I'm also not (intentionally) suggesting that your observations of behavior are accurate or inaccurate, or that the relevant people weren't engaging in the same behavior, just that the grouping of a complaint about people overgeneralizing with defining of the people doing the grouping as members of a very large group was quite striking, to me.
Yes its possible to stereotype and overgeneralize in a positive way, I can say lot of positive things about China and the chinese, but not really when it comes to online gaming culture, sorry!
Its just a general problem with mixing regions like that, similar things could be said about russians in the EU region of CSGO etc..
Unfair game is unfair game no matter what nation / race or skin color you are
The fact that the parent was objecting to every member of a group of people treating all members of another group of people similarly struck me quite strongly when reading it, separate from the discussion about differences in culture.
If you have, plz reply with why he's wrong.
@cannedslime: I pretty much agree with everything you state, except the "racist" part. They are just normal teenagers, griefing ppl they can't communicate with for Lulz.
The most extreme form of cheating I’ve seen is a few people using no-recoil scripts, and I’ve never had a problem with the behavior of Chinese players. In fact, I’ve gotten to learn a bit of the language to communicate with them, and it’s great fun to try and cross the language barrier. They often reciprocate, I’m kinda sad I might potentially see less of them.
Maybe it’s because I’m on desktop? Who knows...
As an example, I speak languages other than English, but I wouldn't dare speak them in a public channel in the game because I know it's impolite. Chinese players didn't get that memo.
But this is part of the same thing as impolite Chinese tourists, etc. It's a cultural thing.
Cheats are a rational response to the idiotic "loot box" incentives that are popular with game companies that are only able to see 72 hours into the future.
Peacekeeping means they will fight right? Is it a doublethink to call the UN Peacekeeping force a peacekeeping force if they have guns and stuff?
I don't see any other links with the Chinese Airforce, aside from the Weibo shoutout to 空军招飞局 (Airforce recruiting) on the Weibo post.
Also if they made a game about UN Peacekeepers shooting people and called it Peace-Keeping Elites it would still be pretty funny to a US audience. They they might be called Peacekeepers but if you made a game about them shooting people and called them that no one would miss the irony of that.
I guess Three Kingdoms Total War won't be available in the country it is based on...