This reminds me of other software package that was "free forever" but then became popular and lost its "free forever" title. (I forget the name)
How will this not happen here?
I'm just sceptical of wild claims like these. Surely if this software grew legs the devs would have to charge?
> When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.