Because she's not talking about the misconduct, but about the response to the misconduct.
One of the reasons she's not talking about the misconduct is because misogynists will seek to relitigate the orginal event with the predictable victim-blaming concern-trolling.
1) The actual incident.
2) The need for instructors to persuade DataCamp to make a response.
3) The response itself. (3a: the noindex tag)
#1 is very bad on its own, but #2 and #3 are its own problems and the ones being highlighted in recent discussions. (and provide more context for #1)
This is what people always say in these threads: don't talk about it in public until you've tried to deal with it in private. Well, they did try, and they got fired.
True, but it was not adequately summarized in the article which is the topic of discussion, and this was the issue discussed in this subthread.
> This is what people always say in these threads: don't talk about it in public until you've tried to deal with it in private.
That’s not what I meant, or what anyone else in this subthread meant. I have no idea what you’re responding to.