> 2) nuking some combination of India and China
No one is advocating for #2 or anything like it because it's a completely incompetent and reprehensible idea.
No one is advocating for #2 or anything like it because it's a completely incompetent and reprehensible idea.
Climate-precipitated societal collapse is surely preferable to all over a large-scale nuclear war that is suggested to have been unilaterally invoked, tantamount to murder of billions and multiple genocides. That kind of 'solution' has no place in reasonable discourse about climate change mitigation or adaptation.