http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-china-muslim-crackd...
http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-china-muslim-crackd...
I can see why the US government is perturbed. The more patriotic thing to do would be helping the NSA, FBI, and a bunch of good, old-fashioned American TLAs build up our own government surveillance network against our own people, and maybe helping the CIA and US Military build up its surveillance network of the Chinese people.
Second of all, most universities in China are affiliated with the government; this one just has a snappier name. It would also appear the two individuals in question are grad students at Simon Fraser University in Canada.
Third, MS has been and will continue to catch uneducated & poorly-researched flak like this for operating in China in any capacity.
Every major corridor is covered LPR and facial recognition by the DEA’s LPR initiative and and CBPs border nexus surveillance programs.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/05/aclu-dea-docum...
That’s in addition to the wide variety of state, local and private systems.
Microsoft entered into a well publicized partnership with NYPD on intelligence/surveillance stuff back in 2012. They may have lines they won’t cross, but are hardly innocent.
Only civil government can stop the creeping nature of expanding military and paramilitary powers.
However, it'd make more sense to help your own establishment vs a foreign one.
MS being a global company, one has to wonder how much MS HQ can prevent other branches from engaging in very lucrative projects like that.
Either way, good reply. /s
Also, the government didn't knock Microsoft for not helping spy on U.S. citizens— they were mad that they helped the Chinese spy on their own citizens, which they asserted was morally wrong enough to be considered a human rights abuse. My response was not "criticizing the government for wanting national companies to help it," I was criticizing them for having a two-faced stance on governments surveilling their own citizens.