A good test of a country's quality of healthcare is where people that don't have to worry about money go to get treated....that's currently the US.
It has problems, but sacrificing quality for nationalization is not the solution.
A good test of a country's quality of healthcare is where people that don't have to worry about money go to get treated....that's currently the US.
It has problems, but sacrificing quality for nationalization is not the solution.
If you have any kind of moderate condition in the USA you are likely screwed. Of course our system protects against catastrophic incidents and helps with basic checkups but everything in between is not covered by most plans.
Do you think $500 a month is cheap? That's insane - that's about a quarter of my entire income tax in the UK.
> It has problems, but sacrificing quality for nationalization is not the solution.
But both life expectancy is lower and infant mortality is higher in the US than in the UK.
What quality do you think you'd be sacrificing? I'm getting better life expectancy and infant mortality than you are, and I'm paying a lot less than you are.
Source: https://www.denverpost.com/2009/09/03/health-care-in-denmark...
[0] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/alex-smith-died-couldnt-af...