That is, in my experience, untrue, if it is highlighted in a way that unjustly lifts one contribution above all others.
Does not tend to make collaborators happy. Since there is no money involved (as in, no big salary increases), academics (being one myself) are incredibly petty about these things, and bitter feuds are fought about small points of recognition.
For example, another female collaborator of hers was actually the one to point out that Katie Bouman's algorithm was not the one used for the image, as pointed out by the NYT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/science/katie-bouman-blac...