Hacker News Reader

Comment by lobotryas | Hacker News Reader

Are you kidding? True AVs will make Uber/Luft even MORE profitable because they won’t have to pay out or worry about human drivers. AVs are the end game for these companies.

View on HN

They will have to pay out and worry about the cars, so this is true only if the cost of buying and maintaining the AV is less than the cost of paying a driver, and I’ve seen no evidence yet that this is or ever will be the case.

They don't have to buy the cars they use today, what makes you think they'll have to buy them when they're self driving?

I can’t tell if you’re joking? Today the drivers buy the cars. A driverless car can’t buy itself, so some entity will have to, and if it is not Uber itself buying the car whoever did buy it will want to get paid just like today’s drivers do.

I'm not joking, and you seem to have missed the entire reason people think of self driving cars + ride-sharing services as being a game changer.

Today people drive others around for money. Tomorrow people let their cars drive people around for money. No one thinks Lyft and Uber are going to be buying the cars, people just won't need to be physically in them to make money from Uber and Lyft any more.

Just because self driving cars are a game changer doesn't mean that all (or even any) of the benefit accrues to Uber. Who holds pricing power in this scenario? The company that makes the car, the person who owns the car, the agent (Uber/Lyft/etc.), or the rider? I think there's a reasonable case to be made that the agents are the most commodity-like element. Tesla e.g. has already shown a desire to use value-based pricing to capture their share of the money-making potential of the cars they sell. Any owner will prefer to rent their car via the agent that pays them the most. Any rider will prefer to rent it through the agent that charges the least.

While I disagree, that's at least a valid argument. You should start with that instead of asserting that the capital requirements of buying up a bunch of cars will be the limiting factor.

True AV are not possible right now nor for the foreseeable future. The technology has plateaued progress has slowed after the first rounds of demo technology showcases by all the big players. New research breakthroughs are needed and more robust and cheaper sensors. Throwing more money/people at the problem doesn't solve this and betting on AVs to make Uber profitable is a very long bet.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com