Either Zuckerberg don’t want to move a finger, or he simply want regulators to regulate Facebook and other social media to create a higher barrier of entry into the social media market.
Either Zuckerberg don’t want to move a finger, or he simply want regulators to regulate Facebook and other social media to create a higher barrier of entry into the social media market.
Facebook claims not many people saw the video before it was taken down which I call bullshit on because if it wasn't viewed by many it would never have trended to a 11yo kid.
(I think hes too young for facebook but that's an entirely different issue)
That would solve the birthday use case while inhibiting the virality.
That's not necessarily good! Maybe the ability to live-streaming police brutality or vote stuffing or whatever, in a way that could go viral, is an important public good. But no one seems to have brought that up, either.