Look at the conclusion of the piece. He agrees: it should be about the stories. His beef is with the writers lazily resorting to retarded engineering time after time.
Perhaps this stems from the fact that few writers also have an engineering background, and as such don't look at the plots they assemble the same way we might?
They're also under alot of time pressure to produce scripts so the filming, and retake after retake, can get done. IANAE but I imagine for a weekly show that's not easy. Having tried to both a regular blog and a book, it's harder than it seems.
If they toned down the technobabble, Star Trek would be nearly watchable.