'including' stuff entails a whole host of ugly things including multiple definitions, circular dependencies etc. etc..
Most languages use some kind of module resolution, which when specified clearly is usually better. Of course sometimes they forget to define things, and leave us in a lurch ... but hey ...
Cool language though. I love everything except for the name, sorry :)
The name.. I think people will quickly forget about the original meaning. Think of all the languages you know, and how you associate the name with the language, not some snake, a musical note, degraded iron, a french philosopher, etc. Some of these names are actually pretty silly.
As for associating the name of the language, the only one I can't get past on that is 'Pony', it just has too much MLP fandom association for me to take it seriously.
[0] https://www.beliebte-vornamen.de/wp-content/uploads/adolf-1....
If Sartre isn't already an esolang built around the concept that hell is other programmers, then someone should make it.