Methane is an extremely simple molecule of carbon and hydrogen. Doesn't seem too surprising to me that it's found all over the place.
Methane is an extremely simple molecule of carbon and hydrogen. Doesn't seem too surprising to me that it's found all over the place.
Microbes is one exciting option. Methanogenesis is the process of the production of methane in microbes. It occurs in anaerobic respiration (i.e. the microbes wouldn't need oxygen to make methane - check on Mars). It's the final step in the consumption of old biomass. So, presumably, one could've had microbes feeding on old organic material spewing methane. It would explain why there are spikes in the methane levels, as the sun's radiation would have degraded any old methane over time.
The other option is some sort of volcano or fissure in the planet's surface, which would allow a geochemical source of methane, I don't know much about that process though.
If you read the article, they explain where the methane is coming from.
While it is certainly pretty likely, it isn't necessarily known that this rock is part of methane generation.
If it's coming from the ice directly, the ice sheet 'location' doesn't explain whether the methane was from a biotic or abiotic source.
It probably eliminates the already-small likelihood that it is coming from still-extant microorganisms, but it doesn't eliminate their possible involvement in clathrate formation.
> If you read the article, they explain where the methane is coming from.
This is technically true in a spatial sense, but not at all true in reference to the GP's point. The article specifies only the location of the source, not whether the source is biotic or abiotic.