It is a very interesting read but the title is a bit clickbaity. Luckily it's not with bad intentions, the first few lines (above) already tell you what it is.
> I'm not sure what the distinction you're making is
Imagine I tell you I can extract any information I want from the human brain. You'd be intrigued, how do I interface, how do I extract and process the data. Then I tell you I basically eavesdrop on your conversations.
I understand the end result is the same, the mechanism is compromised but the method makes all the difference to how interested I am in the article. I've read about sniffing already, I was now expecting to read how the TPM chip was "cracked".