I think you mean a 1.5% failure rate, given that there were 133 successful missions.
This is some flat-earth level misinformation right here.
If 40% of the Boeing 737 Max planes went down would you call that engineering for the long haul? This has absolutely nothing to do with flat earth nonsense, your comment is the literal definition of the strawman argument.
For an infinite timeline, all cars will break down, therefore cars have a 100% failure rate.
To be fair, it would be more like 40% of cars failing after 50,000 miles instead of 150,000