Hacker News Reader

Spectre is a special case and I think you know it's a special case. Cut it out.

Why's it not a valid counter-example? It's a special case because it doesn't fit the 90 day estimate? Well yeah that's why it's a counter-example.

Because at it's core, it's a hardware design flaw, not a software bug.

Also it affected multiple vendors, not one, so coordination across a minimum of 10 major organizations (google, apple, MS, Amazon, Intel, amd, Linux, etc.) breaks the normal assumptions behind project 0.

Given those issues, different rules make sense. It's not a normal case where a single vendor has a flaw that can be fixed with a single patch.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com