US/Canada human rights arguments arguments are pretty galling by a NA Aboriginal POV.
I think the protester in Tianemen square had more of a chance than the students in Kent State.
Kettle And pot are black as night.
US/Canada human rights arguments arguments are pretty galling by a NA Aboriginal POV.
I think the protester in Tianemen square had more of a chance than the students in Kent State.
Kettle And pot are black as night.
Sure thing.
By this metric the US and Canada can never condemn other countries for human rights abuses. Bringing up wrongs committed hundreds of years ago is simply a distraction given what China is doing to the Uighurs.
> I think the protester in Tianemen square had more of a chance than the students in Kent State.
Somewhere between 500 - 2600 people were killed in Tiananmen square. No one knows the real number because no one is allowed to talk about it. You're really reaching here.
There was literally ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE more killed at Tianemen square.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Tiananmen-Square-incident
from this, we get at least 1 million people at the protests, but I dont know how many in one day, etc, so this gets tricky.
from wikipedia, I believe there was about 2k at the kent protests. so 4/2000 ~ .002 and 5k (middle of 10k) you get about .005 - but this would vary a lot depending on what numbers you use.
to be pedantic (you did say literally), orders of magnitude would suggest a multiplier of at least 10, which it doesn't seem we have. Though I concede, who knows how many really died in the Tianemen protests. Kent is pretty well known, which does say something
edit: does say something about the freedoms we have in press