It's directly germane to my larger point about the results of eschewing personal standing.
> lambaste me for the ills you perceive, which is a bit ironic given the content of your message
From your earlier comment:
> So yes, we can absolutely be happy they are being demonitized
The difference is that you are starting to go on the group-offensive, celebrating the winning against one flavor of Youtube nutter.
The original comment did tangentially bring up anti-vax, yes. But my point is we should aim to tolerate that, as it's tangential. Focusing on that single aspect then either results into re-arguing whether the censorship is good (which can only go more meta, because obviously the immediate anti-vax phenomenon itself is bad), or simply left to sit and form a tacit consensus that censorship is worthwhile.
(I apologize for having focused on you by virtue of you being the only commenter, and good on you for vouching - directly opposing the main symptom).