The "funny" thing is, it wasnt using HTTPS, it was on the 443 port. But the data was sent unencrypted.
[Analogies may be terrible, but lack of encryption is an additional factor making attacks even easier, particularly for the purpose of discovering the attack vectors.]
Their business idea was to handle calls that were placed in inconvenient hours, relative to Swedish business hours.
My best guess is that the Thai ISP this office used filtered all outgoing connections except port 80 and 443.
And then someone decided that the way to implement this securely while still allowing this office to access the data was to put a plain HTTP server on port 443. "Who is ever going to crack that?"
https://www.voiceintegrate.com/se/support/vi-som-jobbar-h%C3...