I agree with being skeptical but there is a point where rational skepticism just turns into pure cynicism and that's not productive.
Also, with the advances in deep fakes and synthetic video...how long before you can't trust video evidence either?
Also, with the advances in deep fakes and synthetic video...how long before you can't trust video evidence either?
I suppose one place to start thinking about this would be photos. Are photos admissible evidence or do courts only allow negatives? Photos have been modified for a very long time. This is probably the most famous example: https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/52af668569bedd3b2643d...
But yes, I am far more worried about how much more effective fake news will be once they start coming with actual videos.
You shouldn’t trust any single source. Only a preponderance. Even then be open to skeptics