What's the best alternative way to minimize the number of people in the country illegally?
It's fine enough to say this option sucks, but you have to bring a better one.
It's fine enough to say this option sucks, but you have to bring a better one.
The rate of immigration must be carefully controlled if disaster is to be avoided. You can bake a cake at 350, but nothing good will come of baking it at 3500 (much less 35,000).
Make it easier to immigrate legally.
Has there been similar studies in the US?
Fix the rules on allocating legal slots to be sensible, starting with aligning supply with demand by eliminating the per country proportion limit of the global allocation in each category would be the best alternative, but you don't need the best to be a better alternative.
> It's fine enough to say this option sucks, but you have to bring a better one.
Literally doing nothing would be better, on a net benefit after costs perspective, then building a wall.
I'm far more open to arguments about who is harmed by the alternatives and to what degree.