> It is madness – and no amount of mansplaining from billionaires will be adequate to justify it.
We can certainly discuss about the data and how to interpret it, but using such phrases in a newspaper-article isn't really helpful either.
> It is madness – and no amount of mansplaining from billionaires will be adequate to justify it.
We can certainly discuss about the data and how to interpret it, but using such phrases in a newspaper-article isn't really helpful either.
[mansplaining]
...I mean, Hinkel's a dude too and should perhaps avoid the term, but these are men spouting nonsense and telling off more expertised people, so it's not too far off.
Calling them mansplaining billionairs is IMHO a cheap shot. Pinker and Hinkel have different opinions - which is perfectly fine, experts disagree a lot after all. But accusing someone of mansplaining just because of having a different opinion is not correct. An expert in this area should argue differently.