> The term 'deep fake' means an audiovisual record created or altered in a manner that the record would falsely appear to a reasonable observer to be an authentic record of the actual speech or conduct of an individual.
This limits the scope of the act to prohibiting deep fakes that are not explicitly labeled as such. If the recording (or, potentially, links to the recording) contains any type of disclaimer, that should be sufficient to establish that no reasonable observer would consider it to be authentic.
But I wonder if this provides enough protection to victims in the case of deep fakes where a person's face is grafted onto sexual content or other content that might embarrass the person, whether or not a disclaimer exists.
For instance, if someone puts an acquaintance's face into a sex scene and distributes it online, then even if there's a huge "This is a deep fake" scrolling disclaimer across the video, that person may still feel as if they have been defamed.