I like the clean look and the overall way it is presented. The examples using angle brackets (eg.: <list>.append(<el>) ) is highly legible and the one column format is faster to scan.
If you are going to write a cheatsheet with samples of Python code, why not write it in valid Python?
This is clearly aimed at beginners as the samples are or very basic things, yet this is going to be confusing to them as they will think that `<list>` is syntax.
Have a look at the Python docs for much better ways of doing this
The Python docs (example here[1]) on the other hand limit themselves to {}, [] and () to differentiate between dicts, lists and tuples, but doesn't really differentiate between these and the more generalized notions of collections/iterators/element, etc.
As someone who codes in statically typed languages and has an intuitive sense of upcasting / downcasting / contravariance / covariance, this level of precision makes sense to me and enhances my appreciation for Python types.
That said, I've also been writing Python professionally since 2005 so I'm comfortable with not worrying too much about types in Python -- with dynamic typing things just work as long as they have the right shape and behavior.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/threading.html#threading.T...