So what I mean is that whatever argument is made to make it illegal for police to strike (assuming it is), the same argument applies to ATC.
So what I mean is that whatever argument is made to make it illegal for police to strike (assuming it is), the same argument applies to ATC.
There are many airports that are just a runway and have CTAF (Common Traffic Advisory Frequency) where pilots advise each other of their position, heading, intentions, etc.
ATC can give clearances to aircraft landing and taking off from such airports, but the clearances only apply in controlled airspace, usually starting 700ft above the ground. ATC can also make sure there are no other IFR traffic for aircraft requesting clearances, but if it's VMC (visual meteorological conditions), there could be VFR traffic for the IFR aircraft that ATC is not talking to.
Most Jets and planes people have experience with would be flying at those altitudes.
Civilian flights in Class A airspace (at or above 18,000ft in most places) require an IFR clearance.
State flights can fly "due regard" (VFR) in Class A airspace.
In Hawaii, there is no Class A airspace, and I once controlled a civilian aircraft flying VFR at FL210 (21,000ft).
Disruption