Imagine if housing was affordable somewhere other than Stockton. Then maybe people would live in SF and the South Bay (aka: "Silicon Valley") rather than huddling together on the BART and Caltrain. If we had housing closer to our work and commercial areas, people could walk more, too. Instead, folks travel for 1-2 hours each way because they can only afford to live far into the East Bay. I don't know for sure if this would work, but it seems logical that people want to live closer to work, if possible.

I argued against your ad hominem fallacies quite sufficiently, thank you.

Seeing as I found your substantive claims to be backed by no data, evidence or anything other than low-level ad hominem attacks (propaganda, tech bros, etc) I found no reason to engage with such radicalism on the merits.

Try speaking like an intelligent person who doesn't fill their "claims" with nasty personal attacks, and you might find the replies to you do the same.