At least the author gave us the courtesy of italicizing his broken assumption from the outset of the post.

> Because, at scale, a monorepo must solve every problem that a polyrepo must solve, with the downside of encouraging tight coupling, and the additional herculean effort of tackling VCS scalability.

Right.

But you have to get to "scale" first (as it relates to VCSs). Most companies don't. Even if they're successful. Introducing polyrepos front loads the scaling problems for no reason whatsoever. A giant waste of time.

Checkmate! I didn't even need a snarky poll. The irony of that poll is that it clearly demonstrates his zealotry, not other people's.