If the tests do turn up any issues the treatment depends specifically on what the issues are.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662178/
And of course one's gut bacteria culture heavily depends on what one eats.
This is an article about a different approach to detect/diagnose depression, and the first comment reads a lot like “this weird trick I used to beat depression”.
The “Not meaning to demean anyone's hard work with psychology, but” really doesn’t help. They found a way to beat their depression, what does it have to do with other people’s hard work in psychology ?
Of course, there are more factors to depression beyond just language. Your body's internal chemistry is also going to factor in.
You say cutting carbs and fibers from your diet helped you. It might help some other people as well. For yet another group of people with depression, such a change might not help at all.
There's no magic solution and there are many, many possible causes for why a person is suffering from depression.
With the proper knowledge, it's relatively easy to identify diet deficiencies (e.g. low iron, calcium, or vitamin D levels) but it can be a lot harder to pinpoint excess as the body generally does a good job ridding itself of too much of something.
Effects of diets can also take years and years to study. Look at Keto. Lots of people are claiming to see great results from it. I've tried it myself and have seen the positive effects.
The problem is nobody knows what the long term effects of Keto will be. They look great in the short-term, like "curing" diabetes, but the long term results aren't so clear. There's a chance that a Keto diet (or any diet) could be placing significant unseen stress on the body.
If you haven't been tested, you should have your doctor get you the blood test since knowing for sure may point to other things (e.g. beer) that you should stay away from and may inform other medical decisions.
Caloric restriction reduces inflammation, and chronic inflammation is a big problem in the first world.
No? I still eat the same amount of calories (~3000 calories a day, I'm a male who works put regularly). There are more than enough non-carb sources to get calories from (lean meats (chicken breast, turkey breast, pork), sea food, avocado, nuts)
Sure, I just meant that most people are too quick to attribute causation when they notice a correlation. Sounds like you track your calories, so that could rule out caloric restriction.
The composition of the elimination diet almost certainly has nothing to do with the resolution of symptoms, just the feeling of being in complete control. We know that people report a wide range of foods as "bad," and one person's "bad" foods are another person's "good" foods, so any particular suggestions are going to be useless. Its been my observation its entirely about perception, not anything to do with the foods they consider "bad," most people I know with extreme diets that have cured all sorts of illnesses actually eat foods that are on their "bad" list because they don't realize it can fit into their "bad" category.
i think a lot of this kind of diet related advice is anecdotal and very person-specific. we should absolutely ask people to experiment with their diet more, but depending on the extent of their depression and the amount of flexibility they have in their lives (someone who works two jobs a day might find it difficult to find the energy to change their cooking/eating habits), this could be quite difficult for them
and its totally possible that a significant fraction (possibly even the majority) of people suffering from depression will see no major benefits to changing their diets.
100g strawberries carbohydrate 8g (basically the rest of the weight is water)
These are hardly "not eating carbohydrates".
Also, considering any product of modern agriculture "paleolithic" is inaccurate. The almonds and strawberries differ greatly from the wild varieties available to primitive hunter-gatherers - largely because they have drastically increased carbohydrates - but even the chickens/turkeys/cows producing meat and eggs are very different from undomesticated animals.
Even kale and broccoli didn't exist before about 4000 years go.
Also, WHICH Paleolithic people? I must imagine that those people ate varied diets that were contingent on their locality. People on the tundra would maybe not be eating so many nuts.
Encouraging people to construct their diet by imagining the past is a useless exercise.
Does that help?
Or any fruits or vegetables you can buy in any modern restaurants or stores.
Or meat from any domesticated animal.
Not sure that helps, frankly.
Even if there was, the foods that existed in Paleolithic times no longer exist due to both natural genetic changes combined with selective breeding.
Changing a diet seems like a hard thing to do while you are suffering from depression.