This article is wrong. There exists a duopoly all over the US in broadband Internet - one can choose DSL or Cable - because every local municipality grants a local monopoly to one phone company and one cable company (and they usually choose one of the largest national companies in each case).

We need to break these monopolies and allow any company to build infrastructure. Then we will see competition increase and prices go down.

Not mentioned in the article is the UK, which has exactly the system I am proposing - one with almost no government regulation - and is at least on par with all the countries listed in the article, if not doing better. This example goes to show that socialist infrastructure and regulation is not the essential factor that makes broadband access better.