Free trade is from some points of view an illusion. Markets are ruled by the most powerful up to a point. If a country wishes to boost its' industry, then state intervention to market forces is, when used keenly, a useful tool.
The fact that most industrial countries bootstrapped their development by happily ripping of patents and supporting their own industries through state intervention is often forgotten nowadays when discussing what is fair and what is not in global trade.
In the early 19th century US ripped their factory tech from the british. Etc.
See for example:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-industrial-esp...
Similar stories can be found from around the globe.
So, just to make this clear: you cannot really argument from a fairness point of view, but, you can of course argument from US centric point of view - which is totally fine, just as long as you understand you are not on a moral high ground, but just supporting a particular team in a game.
the only good thing trump has done is the china tariffs
You do realize the number of countries US has destabilized over the years is not an insignificant one?
And that the results have seldom been satisfactory to anyone but the particular companies that benefitted from the escapade?
What you are saying amounts to that the right of american companies to make a profit is more important than the political sovereignty, happiness and wellness of peoples living in countries which threat these profits.
it can easily become the cause of another world war,better their govt become destabilized than the whole world