If he’d had zero kids, I’d sympathize and say RIP, what a tragedy.
But he DID have a kid. A kid he abandoned. Bourdain is not just mean for that decision — he’s borderline evil.
If he’d had zero kids, I’d sympathize and say RIP, what a tragedy.
But he DID have a kid. A kid he abandoned. Bourdain is not just mean for that decision — he’s borderline evil.
What you're saying here is "I acknowledge that guy had a condition that made his thought process irrational. But.. what an asshole for making an irrational decision!"
How can you call that logical?
If you want to deny the existence of Mental Illness, thats one thing. But to acknowledge it exists and still blame the patient for succumbing to it? That my friend, a level of mental gymnastics that even climate change deniers or flat earthers would envy.
I said that abandoning children is contemptible and all child abandoners including bourdain deserve vilification.