[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/natalierobehmed/2018/12/03/high...
[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/natalierobehmed/2018/12/03/high...
on Instagram the top earners are all females. Kylie Jenner makes $1 million per post, Selena Gomez 800k. And it is ok to be like that as Instagram is 70% female.
I didn't get that from the OP at all - I think it's a valid (and quite an interesting) question to pose (especially as a marketer): what is it about YouTube's audience that seemingly favours male creators?
Not about "forcing" anything, but it's always interesting to dive into why platform demographics differ and the reasons behind it.
(Also, my assumption is "dominate" here isn't like take over, but just "do it really well" - feel free to correct me OP).
I think it is valid in English language to consider this sentence as saying women doing better than men on the platform. dominate is not another word for equality in English.
Should any gender "dominate" here?
Interesting article about it: https://www.google.ca/amp/s/digiday.com/media/demographics-y...
Recently I saw a woman and man commenting on the chess championship on YT, both excellent chess players.
She tried to impress/be liked by being nice and helpful, he tried to impress/be liked by being powerful. This of course should not be taken as a study but a starting point for some thought - he kind of dominated her appearance (though I guess this wasn't his intention).