"You may convey a work based on the Program ... provided that you also meet all of these conditions: ... c) You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy"
The FSF disagrees: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLStaticVsDyna...
> If what you dewxribed were the case, then the Tivoization lawsuit would have went differently instead of GPLv3 coming out.
The anti-Tivoization clause of GPLv3 doesn't deal with a linking issue, it deals with the fact that even if the device maker releases code for modifications under GPLv2, that doesn't let the user modify and replace the code on the device if the device is locked down so as not to accept modified code, and the user hasn't been provided with the appropriate incantations to unlock it.