It seems like Amazon may have violated California law, and under CACI 1903 the buyers of items on the baby-registry list could have standing to sue Amazon for negligent misrepresentation:

Fact: "the item was added to the list by the list's creator"

1. Amazon represented to the buyer that the Fact was true.

2. Amazon's representation was not true.

3. Amazon had no reasonable grounds for believing the Fact was true.

4. Amazon intended the Buyer to rely on this representation.

5. The Buyer reasonably relied on this representation.

6. The Buyer was harmed.

7. The Buyer's reliance on Amazon's representation was a substantial factor in causing the harm.

The core of the issue to puzzle over: How was the buyer of the gift harmed?

https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/docs/caci/1900/1903...