Blackrock have a history of rubber-stamping executive pay packages. In the past, they've voted in favour of proposed CEO pay packages in something like 99% of cases. Some people have argued that doing so benefits Blackrock execs themselves because high pay then becomes the norm.
Which is why I preferer UK Investment Trusts I can vote on the board and their remuneration.
Most vote with the board on all matters.
The only large fund i know that regularly gets its hand dirty is the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund.
A lot of them outsource voting decisions to companies which exist just to aggregate the most "corporate/sensible" way to vote. So the parent saying "they're not activist investors" is probably true, but then every single vote proceeding along "maximise profit according to a consensus view" lines probably isn't great for society.
They follow ISS or similar.
The international space station? Islamic state in Syria?