Hacker News Reader

Comment by jeffmiller | Hacker News Reader

A fun read, but basically another "entrepreneurs are superheroes" article.

It seems unlikely that anyone would get utility out of risk itself, independently of the reward. But many people, given the choice of two scenarios with equal risk/reward ratios, tend to choose the scenario with the higher risk numerator. "Bet big or go home".

View on HN

Totally disagree, lots of people get utility out of the risk itself, and this is the main theme of the article.

Example?

Amusement parks are filled with people that are there solely to get a thrill out of taking large (albeit simulated) risks. The last time I was at Cedar Point I had the crap scared out of me, even though the logical part of my brain kept reassuring the rest of me that the rides are safe.

Extreme Sports? Utility from the risk itself is the whole point of Base Jumping.

Probably has more to do with the visceral pleasure of accelleration (cf. amusement parks) than the risk of death. Otherwise Russian Roulette would be a more popular extreme sport. It sure is more accesible.

i have to agree with the op. i think you can't, e.g. for entrepreneurs, disentangle risk from reward. similarly, with base jumping, risk itself can't be disentangled from the thrill of speed. for instance, i like to snowboard because it gives me the thrill of speed, which is tightly bound up with the sense of being on the edge of control and being out of control.

Base jumping doesn't seem related to the article at hand.

It's related to the utility of risk.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com