Removing means doesn't fix the underlying problems, and it smacks of agenda pushing to suggest otherwise (even if it's a good agenda).
Removing means doesn't fix the underlying problems, and it smacks of agenda pushing to suggest otherwise (even if it's a good agenda).
The general explanation is that many suicides are somewhat spur of the moment, and access to an easy way to kill yourself when you have those moments of weakness increases the chance that a person will follow through. People have this sense that suicides are well thought out decisions that people make when they conclude that their life isn't worth living anymore, but that isn't the case most of the time.
https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/supplement...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-firearms-suicides/...
From a quick google search https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22726520
> Although some individuals might seek other methods, many do not; when they do, the means chosen are less lethal and are associated with fewer deaths than when more dangerous ones are available.
Doesn't mean it's causal, maybe there are confounding factors, but the relationship itself does exists.
With that said, if people are committing suicides I think it's better to look at why they are committing suicides, and then fix that.